We hear a lot about the "Third World"; countries or nations that have not yet reached an adequate economic target. We also hear about "First World" countries; those that have reached a more advanced economic level. The "Second World" are mostly individuals who are not able to fend for themselves, e.g. immigrants in a First World country.I am worried about the situation in the Third World, specifically with Zimbabwe. Now that cholera is rampant, the situation can only get worse. What I find scandalous is that the lives of so many innocents can be compromised as if they were totally expendable! I do not wish to insult or hurt the sensibilities of others, but this situation is utterly ludicrous and therefore unsustainable! I plan not to politicize, but definitely to humanize!!!!I do understand that First World countries can adopt policies of "non-intervention", but I don't understand how can this loss of life be simply allowed. If I'm wrong I will happily retract, but I can only label this action as "Cain's Crime". The thing is that many will blame God for doing nothing. I can only blame those who can do something to help these people and simply don't. What about the First World? Shouldn't we extend our initial definition to countries that have acquired a reasonable degree of "common sense" and "values"? All I see here are men, women and children desperately trying to win an impossible battle; especially under these conditions. What harm can these poor human beings have done? Should we just blame "Kismet"? Are they collateral damage? Victims of being at a wrong time in the wrong place; victims of circumstance?Yarm thinks: Let's also save ourselves by helping these human beings!Labels: Africa, Politics, Third World, World, Zimbabwe